<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Local Democracy &#187; Eave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/tag/eave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk</link>
	<description>Promoting innovation and a conversational local politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Debategraph on the G20</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/04/03/debategraph-on-the-g20/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/04/03/debategraph-on-the-g20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0 and democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debategraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David of Debategraph has dissected the G20 communique, using his Debategraph application. Quite a brilliant idea, Debategraph. It does everything that a pro-democracy technology should do &#8211; it enables a wide range of people to rationalise a problem. Once that&#8217;s done, elected politicians can make and explain their decisions &#8211; not in terms of interests [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brown" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fblog.localdemocracy.org.uk%252F2009%252F04%252F03%252Fdebategraph-on-the-g20%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Debategraph%20on%20the%20G20%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>David of Debategraph has <a href="http://opentopersuasion.com/2009/04/02/dissecting-the-g-20-communique/">dissected the G20 communique, using his Debategraph application</a>.</p>
<p>Quite a brilliant idea, Debategraph. It does everything that a pro-democracy technology should do &#8211; it enables a wide range of people to rationalise a problem. Once that&#8217;s done, elected politicians can make and explain their decisions &#8211; not in terms of interests bought off / betrayed, but as a decision made as a result of a series of trade-offs.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-858" title="debategraph" src="http://localdemocracy.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/debategraph2.jpg?w=300" alt="debategraph" width="300" height="278" /></p>
<p>Debategraph makes us all <em>&#8216;eavesdropable.&#8217; </em>Its worth a million consultations, petitions and &#8216;have your say&#8217; exercises. Crowdsourcing opinion is as easy as crowdsourcing idiocy, and barely more valuable. Crowdsourcing judgment &#8211; and this is what Debategraph does &#8211; is invaluable.</p>
<p>Oh, have I said? I really really like Debategraph&#8230;.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/06/12/let-simon-decide/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Let Simon Decide</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/01/13/poblish-when-crowdsourcing-new-policies-dont-waste-existing-content/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Poblish: when crowdsourcing new policies, don&#8217;t waste existing content</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/06/25/the-whitehouse-is-using-mixedink/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Whitehouse is using MixedInk</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/01/18/poblish-crowdsourcing-new-policies-and-how-blogging-has-to-change/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Poblish: crowdsourcing new policies, and why blogging has to change</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/07/01/visualisations-on-video/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Participative policymaking, design and eavesdropping</a></li></ul></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/04/03/debategraph-on-the-g20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/tag/eave/feed/ ) in 0.94791 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 4:20 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 5:20 am UTC -->
