<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Local Democracy &#187; Easy engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/tag/easy-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk</link>
	<description>Promoting innovation and a conversational local politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The myth of easy engagement: Evans&#8217; Law?</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/11/16/the-myth-of-easy-engagement-evans-law/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/11/16/the-myth-of-easy-engagement-evans-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distributed moral wisdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easy engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evans' Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=1773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick response to Tim Davies&#8217; verygood post about &#8216;The Myth of Easy Engagement&#8217;. There is one argument that supports his general position that, I think, he misses. I&#8217;m sure that sooner or later, some will come up with a frivolous law (like &#8216;Godwin&#8217;s Law&#8216; or &#8216;Muphry&#8217;s Law&#8216;) but if they don&#8217;t, let me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brown" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fblog.localdemocracy.org.uk%252F2009%252F11%252F16%252Fthe-myth-of-easy-engagement-evans-law%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22The%20myth%20of%20easy%20engagement%3A%20Evans%27%20Law%3F%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>Just a quick response to Tim Davies&#8217; verygood post about<a href="http://www.timdavies.org.uk/2009/10/17/the-myth-of-easy-engagement-who-should-participate-and-how/"> &#8216;The Myth of Easy Engagement&#8217;</a>.</p>
<p>There is one argument that supports his general position that, I think, he misses. I&#8217;m sure that sooner or later, some will come up with a frivolous law (like &#8216;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law">Godwin&#8217;s Law</a>&#8216; or &#8216;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry%27s_law">Muphry&#8217;s Law</a>&#8216;) but if they don&#8217;t, let me dibs it:</p>
<blockquote>
<h1><em>Evans&#8217; Law</em></h1>
<p><strong><em>The value of anyone&#8217;s opinion is in inverse proportion to their willingness, ability and opportunity to express it effectively.</em></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>I think that I&#8217;ve outlined this argument <a href="http://www.timdavies.org.uk/2009/10/17/the-myth-of-easy-engagement-who-should-participate-and-how/">here</a>, <a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/06/23/lurkers-intermittent-contributors-and-heavy-contributors/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">here</a>, <a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/06/12/the-disenfranchisement-of-the-willingly-unwired/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">here</a> and <a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/03/10/will-victor-be-the-eventual-victor/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">here</a> already so I won&#8217;t bore you with it again. Chris Dillow has covered it nicely <a href="http://stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_and_mumbling/2009/06/rational-inattention-to-politics.html">here</a> as well.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/06/12/the-disenfranchisement-of-the-willingly-unwired/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The disenfranchisement of the willingly unwired</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/02/03/expertise/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Expertise</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/04/20/the-myth-of-the-rational-voter/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Myth of the Rational Voter</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/06/09/a-few-signpost/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">A few signposts off</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/01/19/the-lust-for-certainty-a-sin/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The lust for certainty &#8211; a sin?</a></li></ul></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/11/16/the-myth-of-easy-engagement-evans-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/tag/easy-engagement/feed/ ) in 5.10057 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 7:40 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 8:40 am UTC -->
