<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Local Democracy &#187; Communities in Control white paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/tag/communities-in-control-white-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk</link>
	<description>Promoting innovation and a conversational local politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Benchmarking and &#039;empowerment&#039; are two different things</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/04/20/benchmarking-and-empowerment-are-two-different-things/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/04/20/benchmarking-and-empowerment-are-two-different-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Evans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communities in Control white paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Managerialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wonk-blogger Will Davies has an excellent post up here. Quoting the Communities in Control White Paper as follows&#8230; We believe that the causes of political disengagement, while complex, can be distilled to a dominant factor: a sense of powerlessness on the part of most citizens that their voices are not being heard, their views not listened [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brown" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fblog.localdemocracy.org.uk%252F2009%252F04%252F20%252Fbenchmarking-and-empowerment-are-two-different-things%252F%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Benchmarking%20and%20%26%23039%3Bempowerment%26%23039%3B%20are%20two%20different%20things%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p><a href="http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/communitiesincontrol"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-953" title="communities-in-control-white-paper" src="http://localdemocracy.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/communities-in-control-white-paper.jpeg" alt="communities-in-control-white-paper" width="122" height="148" /></a>Wonk-blogger <a href="http://potlatch.typepad.com/weblog/2009/04/reasons-we-will-look-back-on-new-labour-with-a-bemused-but-fond-sigh-6244.html">Will Davies has an excellent post up here</a>. Quoting<a href="http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/communitiesincontrol"> the Communities in Control White Paper</a> as follows&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><em>We believe that the causes of political disengagement, while complex, can be distilled to a dominant factor: a sense of powerlessness on the part of most citizens that their voices are not being heard, their views not listened to, their participation unwelcomed or their activity unrewarded.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Will comments: </p>
<blockquote><p><em>Ah, a sense of powerlessness. Not a fact of powerlessness, perhaps induced by the fact that only a small minority of voters actually count &#8211; and are courted politically &#8211; under the British voting system.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s not the strongest argument either in a very hard-hitting piece that finds the weaknesses in New Labour&#8217;s approach to empowerment &#8211; both a reluctance to address the actual problem, and a hubristic faith in the power of management. <span id="more-951"></span></p>
<p>It brings <a href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/1676-the-difference-between-truly-standing-for-something-and-a-mission-statement">this post that I saw on the 37Signals blog</a> (makers of BasecampHQ among other things) about what you get when you read a mission statement saying how committed to excellence you are &#8211; when it&#8217;s been pinned up in a shabby waiting room.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;And you’re sitting there reading this crap and wondering, “What kind of idiot do they take me for?” It’s just words on paper that are clearly disconnected from the reality of the experience.</p>
<p>It’s like when you’re on hold and a recorded voice comes on telling you how much the company values you as a customer. Really? Then maybe you should hire some more support people or offer email support so I don’t have to wait 30 minutes to get help. Or just say nothing. But don’t give me an automated voice that’s telling me how much you care about me. It’s a robot. I know the difference between genuine affection and a robot that’s programmed to say nice things.</p>
<p>Standing for something isn’t just about writing it down. It’s about believing it and living it.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/05/14/empower-failure/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Empower failure</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2008/12/17/new_rules_on_local_government_publicity/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">New rules on local government publicity?</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/02/18/shift-delete/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Shift Delete</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/02/19/command-backspace/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Command Backspace</a></li><li><a href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2008/12/23/local-referendum-coming-to-a-town-hall-near-you/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Local Referendums &#8211; coming to a town hall near you?</a></li></ul></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/04/20/benchmarking-and-empowerment-are-two-different-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/tag/communities-in-control-white-paper/feed/ ) in 12.91815 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 1:22 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 2:22 pm UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/tag/communities-in-control-white-paper/feed/ ) in 0.00186 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 1:52 pm UTC. -->
