<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voting against</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/04/20/voting-against/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/04/20/voting-against/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Promoting innovation and a conversational local politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/04/20/voting-against/comment-page-1/#comment-1848</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 16:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=2358#comment-1848</guid>
		<description>@MatGB - Remember that the AV system a) allows people not to state a second preference, so Labour voters could just seppuku themselves in the name of party loyalty and b) effectively eliminates all but the top two candidates, which in most seats isn&#039;t us (and by doing so prevents 3rd party breakthroughs).

@OP - You might be asking yourself, as we all are, how did I get it so wrong? The answer of course is that all the people &#039;dismayed&#039; by Cameron switch to Labour to avoid him (give or take) and all those &#039;dismayed&#039; by Brown staying voted for the Conservatives. Why? The coverage of coalitions meant that they feared their undesired would be propped up by Nick so actively voted the other way (even in LD safe seats like NE Fife where it didn&#039;t make any sense to do so).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MatGB &#8211; Remember that the AV system a) allows people not to state a second preference, so Labour voters could just seppuku themselves in the name of party loyalty and b) effectively eliminates all but the top two candidates, which in most seats isn&#8217;t us (and by doing so prevents 3rd party breakthroughs).</p>
<p>@OP &#8211; You might be asking yourself, as we all are, how did I get it so wrong? The answer of course is that all the people &#8216;dismayed&#8217; by Cameron switch to Labour to avoid him (give or take) and all those &#8216;dismayed&#8217; by Brown staying voted for the Conservatives. Why? The coverage of coalitions meant that they feared their undesired would be propped up by Nick so actively voted the other way (even in LD safe seats like NE Fife where it didn&#8217;t make any sense to do so).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/04/20/voting-against/comment-page-1/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=2358#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>Forgot to tick that box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to tick that box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/04/20/voting-against/comment-page-1/#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=2358#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;Could the Lib Dems win my a landslide?&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

I keep crunching the numbers, working out proportional swings, guessing at the tactical effect. I never ever thought I&#039;d see the results I&#039;m getting.

Yes, yes they could.  Get above 38%ish in the polls, and assuming there&#039;s some tactical voting in their favour, they (we) win a massive majority.

And under Gordon&#039;s AV plan, it&#039;d be even bigger.

I mean, I preicted we&#039;d break the hundred seat barrier this time; I was told I was being overly optimistic.  I said the debates and media attention would make a difference. I really should have put that fiver down a few months back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>Could the Lib Dems win my a landslide?</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>I keep crunching the numbers, working out proportional swings, guessing at the tactical effect. I never ever thought I&#8217;d see the results I&#8217;m getting.</p>
<p>Yes, yes they could.  Get above 38%ish in the polls, and assuming there&#8217;s some tactical voting in their favour, they (we) win a massive majority.</p>
<p>And under Gordon&#8217;s AV plan, it&#8217;d be even bigger.</p>
<p>I mean, I preicted we&#8217;d break the hundred seat barrier this time; I was told I was being overly optimistic.  I said the debates and media attention would make a difference. I really should have put that fiver down a few months back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/04/20/voting-against/comment-page-1/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=2358#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>confirmed by http://www.slapometer.com. Clegg has been slapped only 5 million times, compared to 20 million for Brown and 15 Million for Cameron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>confirmed by <a href="http://www.slapometer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.slapometer.com</a>. Clegg has been slapped only 5 million times, compared to 20 million for Brown and 15 Million for Cameron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/04/20/voting-against/feed/ ) in 20.11304 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 8:55 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 9:55 am UTC -->
