<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sustainable development and the decline of local interest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/03/17/sustainable-development-and-the-decline-of-local-interest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/03/17/sustainable-development-and-the-decline-of-local-interest/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Promoting innovation and a conversational local politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Hatter</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/03/17/sustainable-development-and-the-decline-of-local-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Hatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=2224#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>While I agree that many signs are not very positive (despite the likes of the Transition Movement), I&#039;d be a little cautious about reading too much into the Hansard findings. Local authorities really stepped up their game on communications from the end of the 90s through into the noughties. I suspect that knowing at least a fair amount is a result of that.

In the past couple of years, this &#039;broadcast&#039; model (Borough magazine to all households) etc has become old hat, hasn&#039;t it, so maybe less effective. If I&#039;m right, then this is simply a measure of the flow of relevant information noticed by citizens, and doesn&#039;t really tell us anything about the type of engagement that makes serious localism possible.

Personally, I&#039;m an advocate of &#039;build it and they will come&#039;, rather than looking for evidence that authorities and communities currently have the capacity to take on devolution / subsidiarity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that many signs are not very positive (despite the likes of the Transition Movement), I&#8217;d be a little cautious about reading too much into the Hansard findings. Local authorities really stepped up their game on communications from the end of the 90s through into the noughties. I suspect that knowing at least a fair amount is a result of that.</p>
<p>In the past couple of years, this &#8216;broadcast&#8217; model (Borough magazine to all households) etc has become old hat, hasn&#8217;t it, so maybe less effective. If I&#8217;m right, then this is simply a measure of the flow of relevant information noticed by citizens, and doesn&#8217;t really tell us anything about the type of engagement that makes serious localism possible.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m an advocate of &#8216;build it and they will come&#8217;, rather than looking for evidence that authorities and communities currently have the capacity to take on devolution / subsidiarity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/03/17/sustainable-development-and-the-decline-of-local-interest/feed/ ) in 5.10252 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 4:42 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 5:42 pm UTC -->
