<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voting systems compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/06/10/voting-systems-compared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/06/10/voting-systems-compared/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Promoting innovation and a conversational local politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julian Morrison</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/06/10/voting-systems-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=1148#comment-512</guid>
		<description>See the graphs here, instant runoff systems are crap. http://zesty.ca/voting/sim/

Approval voting would be both easier and better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the graphs here, instant runoff systems are crap. <a href="http://zesty.ca/voting/sim/" rel="nofollow">http://zesty.ca/voting/sim/</a></p>
<p>Approval voting would be both easier and better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
