<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A defence of political parties: Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/02/19/a-defence-of-political-parties-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/02/19/a-defence-of-political-parties-part-1/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Promoting innovation and a conversational local politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are interactive media experts really improving the quality of democracy? &#171; Local Democracy</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/02/19/a-defence-of-political-parties-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Are interactive media experts really improving the quality of democracy? &#171; Local Democracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=651#comment-96</guid>
		<description>[...] my opening &#8216;defending political parties&#8216; post, I acknowledged that there are a few early knockout punches that could be delivered to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my opening &#8216;defending political parties&#8216; post, I acknowledged that there are a few early knockout punches that could be delivered to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Monk</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/02/19/a-defence-of-political-parties-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=651#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Wrong link perhaps? But I did find the surveys on Lightfoot&#039;s web log.

http://www.ex-parrot.com/~chris/wwwitter/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong link perhaps? But I did find the surveys on Lightfoot&#8217;s web log.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ex-parrot.com/~chris/wwwitter/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ex-parrot.com/~chris/wwwitter/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureGov &#187; Useful links &#187; links for 2009-02-20</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/02/19/a-defence-of-political-parties-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureGov &#187; Useful links &#187; links for 2009-02-20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=651#comment-97</guid>
		<description>[...] A defence of political parties: Part 1 « Local Democracy Engagement vs consultation (tags: consultation politics engagement politicalparties) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A defence of political parties: Part 1 « Local Democracy Engagement vs consultation (tags: consultation politics engagement politicalparties) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/02/19/a-defence-of-political-parties-part-1/feed/ ) in 1.49998 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 3:17 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 4:17 pm UTC -->
