<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#039;We don&#039;t need your stinking checks and balances&#039;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/01/13/we-dont-need-your-stinking-checks-and-balances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/01/13/we-dont-need-your-stinking-checks-and-balances/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Promoting innovation and a conversational local politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The commentariat and their version of democracy &#171; Local Democracy</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/01/13/we-dont-need-your-stinking-checks-and-balances/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>The commentariat and their version of democracy &#171; Local Democracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=354#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] Cameron&#8217;s proposals for directly elected officials and numerous referendums. Reprising the De Tocqueville quote that was used here, he concluded that it was not in the DNA of national politicians to promote decentralised [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cameron&#8217;s proposals for directly elected officials and numerous referendums. Reprising the De Tocqueville quote that was used here, he concluded that it was not in the DNA of national politicians to promote decentralised [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social media, civic engagement, and the need for political leadership &#171; Local Democracy</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/01/13/we-dont-need-your-stinking-checks-and-balances/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Social media, civic engagement, and the need for political leadership &#171; Local Democracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=354#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] - and the weakening of local government - can be found in a political variation on this theme - as De Tocqueville pointed out a long long time ago. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Has local government [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; and the weakening of local government &#8211; can be found in a political variation on this theme &#8211; as De Tocqueville pointed out a long long time ago. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Has local government [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Hatter</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2009/01/13/we-dont-need-your-stinking-checks-and-balances/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Hatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/?p=354#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Good stuff. On your final question, I recall that the higest profile (and possibly main) argument employed by those opposing the introduction of elected mayors in England at the start of the decade/century/millennium was that it was a recipe for corruption, brown envelopes, contracts being awarded to the mayor&#039;s mates, etc.

Several years on, no sign of this among the dozen local govt elected mayors. But the opponents don&#039;t seem to have mellowed ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. On your final question, I recall that the higest profile (and possibly main) argument employed by those opposing the introduction of elected mayors in England at the start of the decade/century/millennium was that it was a recipe for corruption, brown envelopes, contracts being awarded to the mayor&#8217;s mates, etc.</p>
<p>Several years on, no sign of this among the dozen local govt elected mayors. But the opponents don&#8217;t seem to have mellowed &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
