<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the idea of &#039;impartial journalism&#039; deserve challenging?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2008/12/05/impartiality_journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2008/12/05/impartiality_journalism/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Promoting innovation and a conversational local politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickreynoldsatwork</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2008/12/05/impartiality_journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>nickreynoldsatwork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localdemocracy.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Well if he&#039;s &quot;playing a role&quot; then we all are. I prefer to think that he&#039;s simply using his brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if he&#8217;s &#8220;playing a role&#8221; then we all are. I prefer to think that he&#8217;s simply using his brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2008/12/05/impartiality_journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localdemocracy.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Irrespective of Jim Gibney&#039;s views, the last thing we need on our local TV / Radio stations is Sinn Fein activists posing as Journalists.  Furthermore, I find his call rather curious, when the Shinners hark on about Equality.  As I see it, this confirms their idea of Equality...one of Equality for them and for no one else.

No, impartial journalists are what is needed on TV and Radio....Dunseath, a lapsed Prod is enough of bias already against Unionism, without activist Shinners joining him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irrespective of Jim Gibney&#8217;s views, the last thing we need on our local TV / Radio stations is Sinn Fein activists posing as Journalists.  Furthermore, I find his call rather curious, when the Shinners hark on about Equality.  As I see it, this confirms their idea of Equality&#8230;one of Equality for them and for no one else.</p>
<p>No, impartial journalists are what is needed on TV and Radio&#8230;.Dunseath, a lapsed Prod is enough of bias already against Unionism, without activist Shinners joining him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Evans</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2008/12/05/impartiality_journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localdemocracy.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-19</guid>
		<description>&quot;Are you saying that Nick Robinson doesn’t call things as he “really” sees them?&quot;

I&#039;m asking a question rather than necessarily answer it Nick - but I actually don&#039;t think he does. He calls thing as someone who is playing the role of &#039;impartial commentator&#039; sees them - but his background colours sometimes show through. I&#039;d like the BBC to have a range of different political correspondents - and for them to be more &#039;reporter&#039; than &#039;commentator&#039;. The role of &#039;official political commentator&#039; is may be worth reviewing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are you saying that Nick Robinson doesn’t call things as he “really” sees them?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m asking a question rather than necessarily answer it Nick &#8211; but I actually don&#8217;t think he does. He calls thing as someone who is playing the role of &#8216;impartial commentator&#8217; sees them &#8211; but his background colours sometimes show through. I&#8217;d like the BBC to have a range of different political correspondents &#8211; and for them to be more &#8216;reporter&#8217; than &#8216;commentator&#8217;. The role of &#8216;official political commentator&#8217; is may be worth reviewing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickreynoldsatwork</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2008/12/05/impartiality_journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>nickreynoldsatwork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localdemocracy.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-17</guid>
		<description>If you want &quot;named correspondents with fairly well-known prejudices calling things as they really see them&quot;, all you have to do is buy a newspaper.

The phrase &quot;really see them&quot; is telling. Are you saying that Nick Robinson doesn&#039;t call things as he &quot;really&quot; sees them?

Impartiality and diversity do go together. But the key point about impartiality is that is an attempt to be rational and build judgments on fact rather than on prejudice.

The main difference between the newspapers and the broadcasters in this country is that the broadcasters are more rational, or at least try to be.

The question to ask is not &quot;is the journalist impartial?&quot;, but rather &quot;is the journalism?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want &#8220;named correspondents with fairly well-known prejudices calling things as they really see them&#8221;, all you have to do is buy a newspaper.</p>
<p>The phrase &#8220;really see them&#8221; is telling. Are you saying that Nick Robinson doesn&#8217;t call things as he &#8220;really&#8221; sees them?</p>
<p>Impartiality and diversity do go together. But the key point about impartiality is that is an attempt to be rational and build judgments on fact rather than on prejudice.</p>
<p>The main difference between the newspapers and the broadcasters in this country is that the broadcasters are more rational, or at least try to be.</p>
<p>The question to ask is not &#8220;is the journalist impartial?&#8221;, but rather &#8220;is the journalism?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impartiality and journalism « Memeserver Ltd</title>
		<link>http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2008/12/05/impartiality_journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Impartiality and journalism « Memeserver Ltd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localdemocracy.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] pm on December 5, 2008 &#124; # &#124;   Tags: BBC, impartiality, journalism   Thinking about BBC impartiality - is it actually the unqualified virtue that some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pm on December 5, 2008 | # |   Tags: BBC, impartiality, journalism   Thinking about BBC impartiality &#8211; is it actually the unqualified virtue that some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2008/12/05/impartiality_journalism/feed/ ) in 1.98852 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 10:54 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 11:54 am UTC -->
